<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 215 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13, consistently upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The Tribunal found no contrary facts or legal grounds to alter the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, which included deletions of various disallowances and additions. The assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2012-13 was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing further verification on specific issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 215 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13, consistently upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The Tribunal found no contrary facts or legal grounds to alter the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, which included deletions of various disallowances and additions. The assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2012-13 was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing further verification on specific issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>