<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 212 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of assessments under section 143(3) read with section 147 for multiple assessment years. The purchases were not entirely treated as bogus; only the profit element embedded in disputed transactions was added to income at a rate of 3%. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s argument under section 40A(3) regarding cash payments, as payments were made through cheques. All appeals were dismissed, affirming the assessments and profit additions while rejecting the application of section 40A(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 212 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of assessments under section 143(3) read with section 147 for multiple assessment years. The purchases were not entirely treated as bogus; only the profit element embedded in disputed transactions was added to income at a rate of 3%. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s argument under section 40A(3) regarding cash payments, as payments were made through cheques. All appeals were dismissed, affirming the assessments and profit additions while rejecting the application of section 40A(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>