<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292089</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case for review to determine if the ITAT erred in upholding additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act without proper justification from the assessee&#039;s Directors&#039; statements during a search. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 31st July 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292089</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case for review to determine if the ITAT erred in upholding additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act without proper justification from the assessee&#039;s Directors&#039; statements during a search. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 31st July 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>