<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 182 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401383</link>
    <description>The ITAT remitted multiple issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination based on evidence submitted by the assessee. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) had dismissed evidence without proper justification and directed a re-examination. The appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes, with the ITAT emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 182 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401383</link>
      <description>The ITAT remitted multiple issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination based on evidence submitted by the assessee. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) had dismissed evidence without proper justification and directed a re-examination. The appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes, with the ITAT emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>