<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 178 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 773833/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that section 194A did not apply to the financial charges under the hire purchase agreement, and the retrospective effect of the 2nd Proviso to section 40(a)(ia) applied since Tata Capital Ltd. had paid taxes on the charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 178 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 773833/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that section 194A did not apply to the financial charges under the hire purchase agreement, and the retrospective effect of the 2nd Proviso to section 40(a)(ia) applied since Tata Capital Ltd. had paid taxes on the charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>