<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 138 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292080</link>
    <description>The petitioner&#039;s writ application was dismissed due to the provisional nature of Annexure-1, compliance with court orders to the extent feasible, the application of res judicata, and significant delay and laches in filing representations and the writ petition. The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s case was considered on merits during each promotion, and no rights were found to be violated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 138 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292080</link>
      <description>The petitioner&#039;s writ application was dismissed due to the provisional nature of Annexure-1, compliance with court orders to the extent feasible, the application of res judicata, and significant delay and laches in filing representations and the writ petition. The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s case was considered on merits during each promotion, and no rights were found to be violated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>