<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 63 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23947</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court held that, where the questions proposed by the Revenue were identical to questions already directed to be referred in an earlier year involving the same assessee, the Tribunal should state the case and refer both questions of law under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Relying on the earlier reference order, the Court found it appropriate to require reference of the proposed questions rather than refuse it, and directed the Tribunal to make the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 63 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23947</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court held that, where the questions proposed by the Revenue were identical to questions already directed to be referred in an earlier year involving the same assessee, the Tribunal should state the case and refer both questions of law under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Relying on the earlier reference order, the Court found it appropriate to require reference of the proposed questions rather than refuse it, and directed the Tribunal to make the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>