https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292077 Section 80 CPC must be construed liberally and in a commonsense manner, because its object is to give the Government or public officer an opportunity to reconsider and, where appropriate, settle the claim without litigation. A mere discrepancy in the sender's name or description will not invalidate the notice if the recipient is not misled and the claimant's identity is otherwise clear from the notice, surrounding correspondence, and the plaint. On the pleadings, the defendant had not raised a real issue on identity. The notice was therefore held to substantially comply with Section 80, the technical objection failed, and the suit was directed to proceed on the merits. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292077 Section 80 CPC must be construed liberally and in a commonsense manner, because its object is to give the Government or public officer an opportunity to reconsider and, where appropriate, settle the claim without litigation. A mere discrepancy in the sender's name or description will not invalidate the notice if the recipient is not misled and the claimant's identity is otherwise clear from the notice, surrounding correspondence, and the plaint. On the pleadings, the defendant had not raised a real issue on identity. The notice was therefore held to substantially comply with Section 80, the technical objection failed, and the suit was directed to proceed on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292077