https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292075 The court held that the wife and children of the donor did not constitute a tavazhi under Malabar Law. Therefore, the property gifted to them did not carry the incidents of tarwad property, and each donee was entitled to an equal share as joint tenants-in-common. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and lineage structures in interpreting property rights under Marumakkatayam Law. The lower court was directed to provide findings on specific issues before making a final decision regarding the recipients' entitlement to the gifted property. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:16:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292075 The court held that the wife and children of the donor did not constitute a tavazhi under Malabar Law. Therefore, the property gifted to them did not carry the incidents of tarwad property, and each donee was entitled to an equal share as joint tenants-in-common. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and lineage structures in interpreting property rights under Marumakkatayam Law. The lower court was directed to provide findings on specific issues before making a final decision regarding the recipients' entitlement to the gifted property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292075