<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1916 (7) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292074</link>
    <description>A statutory entry under the Oudh Estates Act, 1869 conclusively established the pre-existing family custom of single-heir succession for the taluka, and that proved custom raised a presumption that the same rule also governed the last owner&#039;s non-talukdari acquisitions in a Muhammadan family. The burden was not on the defendant to prove a separate custom for the acquired property; rather, the plaintiff had to affirmatively show a different rule of devolution. As no contrary usage was proved, the presumption was not displaced and the acquired property was treated as following the same custom as the taluka.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1916 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1916 (7) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292074</link>
      <description>A statutory entry under the Oudh Estates Act, 1869 conclusively established the pre-existing family custom of single-heir succession for the taluka, and that proved custom raised a presumption that the same rule also governed the last owner&#039;s non-talukdari acquisitions in a Muhammadan family. The burden was not on the defendant to prove a separate custom for the acquired property; rather, the plaintiff had to affirmatively show a different rule of devolution. As no contrary usage was proved, the presumption was not displaced and the acquired property was treated as following the same custom as the taluka.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1916 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>