<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 145 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401346</link>
    <description>A Look Out Circular was held to be a coercive restriction on the right to travel abroad under Article 21 and could issue only if the governing Office Memorandum and procedural safeguards were satisfied. The framework required disclosed reasons and material showing deliberate evasion, non-appearance, or a real likelihood that the person would leave India to avoid investigation or trial. On the facts, the record showed prior cooperation with investigation and no substantiated finding of flight risk, lack of roots in India, or demonstrated prejudice to India&#039;s economic interests. The LOC and its extension were therefore quashed as unsustainable, but the investigation itself remained unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 145 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401346</link>
      <description>A Look Out Circular was held to be a coercive restriction on the right to travel abroad under Article 21 and could issue only if the governing Office Memorandum and procedural safeguards were satisfied. The framework required disclosed reasons and material showing deliberate evasion, non-appearance, or a real likelihood that the person would leave India to avoid investigation or trial. On the facts, the record showed prior cooperation with investigation and no substantiated finding of flight risk, lack of roots in India, or demonstrated prejudice to India&#039;s economic interests. The LOC and its extension were therefore quashed as unsustainable, but the investigation itself remained unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>