<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1571 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under the amended Section 55A was not valid for the assessment year 2012-13. It was determined that the valuation should be based on the registered valuer&#039;s report as of 01/04/1981, and the addition of long term capital gains based on the DVO&#039;s report was directed to be deleted. The appeals of the assessees were allowed, with the same legal reasoning applied to related appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1571 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under the amended Section 55A was not valid for the assessment year 2012-13. It was determined that the valuation should be based on the registered valuer&#039;s report as of 01/04/1981, and the addition of long term capital gains based on the DVO&#039;s report was directed to be deleted. The appeals of the assessees were allowed, with the same legal reasoning applied to related appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>