<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2153 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292069</link>
    <description>The Essentiality Certificate serves only as a qualifying requirement for permission to establish a medical college and operates within the Central regulatory scheme under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The State Government had no independent power to inspect a running college or withdraw the certificate for reasons unrelated to the original question of essentiality, and its withdrawal was invalid because it was issued under dictation of the Medical Council of India. The certificate-issuing function was treated as quasi-judicial, so Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 did not imply a power of rescission. Conditions VII and XI, which reserved inspection and withdrawal powers, were ultra vires and the withdrawal order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2153 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292069</link>
      <description>The Essentiality Certificate serves only as a qualifying requirement for permission to establish a medical college and operates within the Central regulatory scheme under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The State Government had no independent power to inspect a running college or withdraw the certificate for reasons unrelated to the original question of essentiality, and its withdrawal was invalid because it was issued under dictation of the Medical Council of India. The certificate-issuing function was treated as quasi-judicial, so Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 did not imply a power of rescission. Conditions VII and XI, which reserved inspection and withdrawal powers, were ultra vires and the withdrawal order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>