<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1896 (12) TMI 1 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292049</link>
    <description>The court found no evidence of mental incapacity or undue influence in the execution of the deed of gift. Regarding the validity of the gift under Muhammadan law, the court determined that possession had been effectively transferred for properties in Pingri and Basaiya villages. Despite delays in mutation proceedings, the court upheld the gift, emphasizing that possession transfer had occurred. The court also confirmed the transfer of house property in Agra, dismissing claims of retained possession by the donor. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the lower court&#039;s decree was set aside, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1896 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1896 (12) TMI 1 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292049</link>
      <description>The court found no evidence of mental incapacity or undue influence in the execution of the deed of gift. Regarding the validity of the gift under Muhammadan law, the court determined that possession had been effectively transferred for properties in Pingri and Basaiya villages. Despite delays in mutation proceedings, the court upheld the gift, emphasizing that possession transfer had occurred. The court also confirmed the transfer of house property in Agra, dismissing claims of retained possession by the donor. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the lower court&#039;s decree was set aside, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1896 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>