https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292048 Mere denial of a temple's title, without proof of dishonest misappropriation or fraudulent dealing with temple assets, was treated as insufficient to justify removal of hereditary trustees. Book entries in the family business records, without actual segregation, appropriation, or divestment of identifiable property, were held insufficient to constitute a valid dedication, gift, or trust in favour of the temple, except for an admitted charity fund. A court acting under Section 73 of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927 was held not to have independent power to settle a new scheme where that function was entrusted to the statutory Board. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 1944 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292048 Mere denial of a temple's title, without proof of dishonest misappropriation or fraudulent dealing with temple assets, was treated as insufficient to justify removal of hereditary trustees. Book entries in the family business records, without actual segregation, appropriation, or divestment of identifiable property, were held insufficient to constitute a valid dedication, gift, or trust in favour of the temple, except for an admitted charity fund. A court acting under Section 73 of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927 was held not to have independent power to settle a new scheme where that function was entrusted to the statutory Board. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Aug 1944 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292048