https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292047 The court found that the transfer of shares under exhibits A and FF, related to joint property governed by Marumakkatayam Law, was invalid due to lack of consent from all interested parties, including minors. The transaction did not benefit the entire family, rendering it non-binding. The alleged ratification by the minor was dismissed for lack of evidence. The decree of the lower court was modified to exclude the plaintiff's right to sell specific items of the properties, with the suit dismissed concerning these items. The rest of the lower court's decree was affirmed, and the parties were directed to bear proportionate costs of the appeal. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 1905 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292047 The court found that the transfer of shares under exhibits A and FF, related to joint property governed by Marumakkatayam Law, was invalid due to lack of consent from all interested parties, including minors. The transaction did not benefit the entire family, rendering it non-binding. The alleged ratification by the minor was dismissed for lack of evidence. The decree of the lower court was modified to exclude the plaintiff's right to sell specific items of the properties, with the suit dismissed concerning these items. The rest of the lower court's decree was affirmed, and the parties were directed to bear proportionate costs of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Sep 1905 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292047