<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292044</link>
    <description>A plantation tax measured by the extent and productive potential of plantation land was treated as a tax on land, not on income, so the Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Act, 1960 was within the State Legislature&#039;s competence under Entry 45 of List II. The Court also held that the Act did not violate Article 14 because the classification of plantations rested on a real and intelligible differentia, and the Legislature had latitude to choose taxing subjects so long as the class selected was not treated unequally without a rational basis. The writ challenge therefore failed and the enactment was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292044</link>
      <description>A plantation tax measured by the extent and productive potential of plantation land was treated as a tax on land, not on income, so the Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Act, 1960 was within the State Legislature&#039;s competence under Entry 45 of List II. The Court also held that the Act did not violate Article 14 because the classification of plantations rested on a real and intelligible differentia, and the Legislature had latitude to choose taxing subjects so long as the class selected was not treated unequally without a rational basis. The writ challenge therefore failed and the enactment was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>