https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292036 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reversing the High Court's decision. It inferred that the power of attorney likely authorized the third defendant to sell the property with the consent of adult members for family necessity. The Court emphasized the practical necessity of such delegation when the Karnavan is absent and upheld the validity of the sale deed. The appellants' costs were to be borne by the plaintiffs-respondents. en-us Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292036 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reversing the High Court's decision. It inferred that the power of attorney likely authorized the third defendant to sell the property with the consent of adult members for family necessity. The Court emphasized the practical necessity of such delegation when the Karnavan is absent and upheld the validity of the sale deed. The appellants' costs were to be borne by the plaintiffs-respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292036