https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292029 A suit for redemption of pledged ornaments by the accredited managers of a joint family business was held maintainable despite the plaintiffs not describing themselves in the plaint as such managers and despite non-joinder of other coparceners. The omission was treated as a curable mis-description, because a manager of a joint family business may sue in his own name on behalf of the family business. The objection to non-joinder was therefore not substantial, and the view that the suit should be dismissed on that ground was incorrect. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292029 A suit for redemption of pledged ornaments by the accredited managers of a joint family business was held maintainable despite the plaintiffs not describing themselves in the plaint as such managers and despite non-joinder of other coparceners. The omission was treated as a curable mis-description, because a manager of a joint family business may sue in his own name on behalf of the family business. The objection to non-joinder was therefore not substantial, and the view that the suit should be dismissed on that ground was incorrect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292029