https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292028 Order XLI, Rule 22 CPC permits a respondent to support a decree on grounds decided against it, but it does not allow reopening a pure finding of fact where no substantial question of law arises. In the described Supreme Court analysis, the finding that the lock-out was unjustified remained unassailable on that basis. The document also notes that compensation for the post-17 September 1952 lock-out could not be denied on the speculative assumption that conciliation participation would have led to settlement and lifting of the lock-out; that contention was rejected, and the workmen's entitlement to compensation was affirmed. en-us Thu, 14 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:35:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292028 Order XLI, Rule 22 CPC permits a respondent to support a decree on grounds decided against it, but it does not allow reopening a pure finding of fact where no substantial question of law arises. In the described Supreme Court analysis, the finding that the lock-out was unjustified remained unassailable on that basis. The document also notes that compensation for the post-17 September 1952 lock-out could not be denied on the speculative assumption that conciliation participation would have led to settlement and lifting of the lock-out; that contention was rejected, and the workmen's entitlement to compensation was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292028