https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292009 The court emphasized the importance of communication in finalizing the effectiveness of an order, ruling that an appointment must be communicated to be valid and binding. As the appointment order for the Supervisor of Panchayats position was never communicated to the petitioner, it was deemed incomplete and ineffective. Consequently, the petitioner lacked legal standing to seek relief through a writ petition. The court dismissed the application, discharged the rule, and vacated any interim order, with no costs awarded. This decision underscores the necessity of proper communication in administrative decisions and appointments to ensure clarity and protect individuals' rights. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292009 The court emphasized the importance of communication in finalizing the effectiveness of an order, ruling that an appointment must be communicated to be valid and binding. As the appointment order for the Supervisor of Panchayats position was never communicated to the petitioner, it was deemed incomplete and ineffective. Consequently, the petitioner lacked legal standing to seek relief through a writ petition. The court dismissed the application, discharged the rule, and vacated any interim order, with no costs awarded. This decision underscores the necessity of proper communication in administrative decisions and appointments to ensure clarity and protect individuals' rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292009