<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Questions Tribunal&#039;s 10% Tax Deposit Requirement, Grants Full Stay Due to Financial Hardship Concerns.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55740</link>
    <description>Grant of stay for full amount of tax - I am unable to understand as to why and what circumstances did the Tribunal direct the deposit of 10% of the amount after having recorded that a prima facie case was made out and the deposit would cause financial hardship to the revisionist. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:05:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:05:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Questions Tribunal&#039;s 10% Tax Deposit Requirement, Grants Full Stay Due to Financial Hardship Concerns.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55740</link>
      <description>Grant of stay for full amount of tax - I am unable to understand as to why and what circumstances did the Tribunal direct the deposit of 10% of the amount after having recorded that a prima facie case was made out and the deposit would cause financial hardship to the revisionist. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:05:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>