<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 123 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401324</link>
    <description>The ITAT acknowledged a mistake apparent on record by not considering a Supreme Court decision in the assessee&#039;s favor regarding disallowance under Sec. 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(iii). Consequently, the ITAT recalled its orders for the relevant assessment years and allowed the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee, directing fresh hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 123 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401324</link>
      <description>The ITAT acknowledged a mistake apparent on record by not considering a Supreme Court decision in the assessee&#039;s favor regarding disallowance under Sec. 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(iii). Consequently, the ITAT recalled its orders for the relevant assessment years and allowed the Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee, directing fresh hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>