<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401303</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the CIT(A) acted arbitrarily by enhancing the addition without proper inquiry or investigation. The tribunal held that the CIT(A) did not provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee before enhancing the addition and restored the assessment order of the AO, deleting the addition of Rs. 84 lakhs. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401303</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the CIT(A) acted arbitrarily by enhancing the addition without proper inquiry or investigation. The tribunal held that the CIT(A) did not provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee before enhancing the addition and restored the assessment order of the AO, deleting the addition of Rs. 84 lakhs. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>