<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23928</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that for the purpose of section 22 of the Income-tax Act, the business conducted by the firm should be considered as the business conducted by the partner. Therefore, no income from the property should be calculated for the portion occupied by the firm. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23928</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that for the purpose of section 22 of the Income-tax Act, the business conducted by the firm should be considered as the business conducted by the partner. Therefore, no income from the property should be calculated for the portion occupied by the firm. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>