<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (9) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291998</link>
    <description>The Madras HC article explains that a delegated exemption power affecting fundamental rights is invalid if it is left to unguided and arbitrary administrative choice without objective standards, because such discretion creates discrimination and offends Article 14. It further states that an absolute prohibition on acquiring or installing power looms cannot be sustained as a reasonable restriction on property and trade rights when it operates as part of an unconstitutional control scheme. The discussion also concludes that yarn-distribution powers are likewise impermissible where they permit discriminatory allocation without ascertainable criteria, and that applications must be reconsidered on fair and non-discriminatory principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (9) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291998</link>
      <description>The Madras HC article explains that a delegated exemption power affecting fundamental rights is invalid if it is left to unguided and arbitrary administrative choice without objective standards, because such discretion creates discrimination and offends Article 14. It further states that an absolute prohibition on acquiring or installing power looms cannot be sustained as a reasonable restriction on property and trade rights when it operates as part of an unconstitutional control scheme. The discussion also concludes that yarn-distribution powers are likewise impermissible where they permit discriminatory allocation without ascertainable criteria, and that applications must be reconsidered on fair and non-discriminatory principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>