https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401294 The court addressed the confiscation of goods and conveyance under the KGST Act, CGST Act, and IGST Act due to contravention of specific provisions. The petitioner claimed an inter-state transaction for arecanut purchase and transfer, citing a genuine e-way bill error. The petitioner was advised to utilize the appeal process under Section 107 of the CGST Act, ensuring fairness and preventing immediate actions by authorities. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions to pursue the available legal recourse during the appeal period. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401294 The court addressed the confiscation of goods and conveyance under the KGST Act, CGST Act, and IGST Act due to contravention of specific provisions. The petitioner claimed an inter-state transaction for arecanut purchase and transfer, citing a genuine e-way bill error. The petitioner was advised to utilize the appeal process under Section 107 of the CGST Act, ensuring fairness and preventing immediate actions by authorities. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions to pursue the available legal recourse during the appeal period. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401294