<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 72 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401273</link>
    <description>An addition as unexplained cash credit could not be sustained where the assessee produced the lender&#039;s identity, banking trail, PAN, return of income and loan confirmation, and the remand report accepted the loan receipt; once identity, genuineness and creditworthiness were shown, section 68 relief followed. Ad hoc disallowances of vehicle, salary and purchase expenses were also unsustainable because they were made without cogent reasoning or concrete material. Business expenditure must be examined on the basis of commercial expediency and the businessman&#039;s judgment, not by unsupported estimation. The disputed additions and disallowances were therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 72 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401273</link>
      <description>An addition as unexplained cash credit could not be sustained where the assessee produced the lender&#039;s identity, banking trail, PAN, return of income and loan confirmation, and the remand report accepted the loan receipt; once identity, genuineness and creditworthiness were shown, section 68 relief followed. Ad hoc disallowances of vehicle, salary and purchase expenses were also unsustainable because they were made without cogent reasoning or concrete material. Business expenditure must be examined on the basis of commercial expediency and the businessman&#039;s judgment, not by unsupported estimation. The disputed additions and disallowances were therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>