https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291992 Reversion from an officiating post to the substantive post was held non-punitive where the employee had no legal right to continue in the higher post and the transfer back was based on surplus requirement. By contrast, removal of the employee's name from the promotion panel for Class II service was treated as an action with civil consequences because it affected real promotional prospects. Since the panel formed part of the operative promotional process, exclusion could not be made without notice and an opportunity to show cause. The reversion was sustained, but deletion from the panel was quashed and restoration of the name directed. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:19:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291992 Reversion from an officiating post to the substantive post was held non-punitive where the employee had no legal right to continue in the higher post and the transfer back was based on surplus requirement. By contrast, removal of the employee's name from the promotion panel for Class II service was treated as an action with civil consequences because it affected real promotional prospects. Since the panel formed part of the operative promotional process, exclusion could not be made without notice and an opportunity to show cause. The reversion was sustained, but deletion from the panel was quashed and restoration of the name directed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Jul 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291992