<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 68 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of interest under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act and to allow the remaining brokerage expenses as a deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to determine the fair market value of the house property and tax the income accordingly, partly allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 68 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of interest under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act and to allow the remaining brokerage expenses as a deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to determine the fair market value of the house property and tax the income accordingly, partly allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>