https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291991 An authenticated executive notification carries a presumption of validity, and Article 166(2) does not prevent inquiry into whether the statutory precondition of governmental satisfaction was in fact fulfilled. Satisfaction under the land development statute could be reached through the Ministerial channel authorised by the Rules of Business, and limited delegation to a subordinate officer was recognised for that purpose. By contrast, where the statute made sanction and satisfaction conditions precedent for later directions and declarations, those acts were valid only if lawfully allocated and exercised under the Rules of Business; absent evidence that the Minister was properly moved, the statutory requirements were not met. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291991 An authenticated executive notification carries a presumption of validity, and Article 166(2) does not prevent inquiry into whether the statutory precondition of governmental satisfaction was in fact fulfilled. Satisfaction under the land development statute could be reached through the Ministerial channel authorised by the Rules of Business, and limited delegation to a subordinate officer was recognised for that purpose. By contrast, where the statute made sanction and satisfaction conditions precedent for later directions and declarations, those acts were valid only if lawfully allocated and exercised under the Rules of Business; absent evidence that the Minister was properly moved, the statutory requirements were not met. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291991