<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DIN Deactivation Not Authorized by ROC Under AQD Rules; Conflicts with Companies Act Sections 164(2) &amp; 167(1).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55727</link>
    <description>Activation of Director Identification Number - apart from the fact that the AQD Rules do not empower the ROC to deactivate the DIN, we find that such deactivation would also be contrary to Section 164(2) read with 167(1) of CA 2013 inasmuch as the person concerned would continue to be a director of the Defaulting Company. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:07:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DIN Deactivation Not Authorized by ROC Under AQD Rules; Conflicts with Companies Act Sections 164(2) &amp; 167(1).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55727</link>
      <description>Activation of Director Identification Number - apart from the fact that the AQD Rules do not empower the ROC to deactivate the DIN, we find that such deactivation would also be contrary to Section 164(2) read with 167(1) of CA 2013 inasmuch as the person concerned would continue to be a director of the Defaulting Company. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:07:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>