<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 480 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291977</link>
    <description>Gratuity becomes payable on termination of employment, including resignation, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Where an employee resigned before the appointed day on which management of a textile undertaking vested in the Central Government and was later transferred, the liability had already accrued against the original textile company. Section 3(7) of the Textile Undertakings (Take Over of Management) Act, 1983 preserves pre-appointed-day liabilities against the textile company, and that liability is not shifted to the Central Government, the Custodian, or the National Textiles Corporation. Section 6(1) does not curtail that effect, and the Preamble cannot override clear statutory language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 10:11:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 480 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291977</link>
      <description>Gratuity becomes payable on termination of employment, including resignation, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Where an employee resigned before the appointed day on which management of a textile undertaking vested in the Central Government and was later transferred, the liability had already accrued against the original textile company. Section 3(7) of the Textile Undertakings (Take Over of Management) Act, 1983 preserves pre-appointed-day liabilities against the textile company, and that liability is not shifted to the Central Government, the Custodian, or the National Textiles Corporation. Section 6(1) does not curtail that effect, and the Preamble cannot override clear statutory language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>