<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 47 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, allowing the appeal of the assessee against the assessment for Assessment Year 2015-16. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer had applied due diligence in estimating income and considering all relevant aspects, deeming the revision by the Principal Commissioner as unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 47 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, allowing the appeal of the assessee against the assessment for Assessment Year 2015-16. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer had applied due diligence in estimating income and considering all relevant aspects, deeming the revision by the Principal Commissioner as unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>