<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 31 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demands based on presumed production derived from Standard Input Output Norms (SION) without corroborative evidence. The invocation of the extended period of limitation and imposition of penalties under Section 11AC were deemed unwarranted due to the lack of evidence of intentional evasion of duty. Both appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 31 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demands based on presumed production derived from Standard Input Output Norms (SION) without corroborative evidence. The invocation of the extended period of limitation and imposition of penalties under Section 11AC were deemed unwarranted due to the lack of evidence of intentional evasion of duty. Both appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>