<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 27 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401228</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order granting exemption under Section 11 and deleting the addition of Rs. 12,52,61,694. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s activities charitable and no discrepancies in declared receipts. Additionally, the ITAT ruled the CIT(A) correctly considered the revised Form 26AS, as the AO had not properly addressed the rectification petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 27 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401228</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order granting exemption under Section 11 and deleting the addition of Rs. 12,52,61,694. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s activities charitable and no discrepancies in declared receipts. Additionally, the ITAT ruled the CIT(A) correctly considered the revised Form 26AS, as the AO had not properly addressed the rectification petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>