<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 22 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to recall the order dated 25-05-2012 was upheld as it was found that there was a mistake apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal&#039;s invocation of its powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to rectify the error was deemed justified. Consequently, the appeal for the Assessment Year 2007-08 was dismissed in favor of the assessee, with the substantial questions of law being answered against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 22 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to recall the order dated 25-05-2012 was upheld as it was found that there was a mistake apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal&#039;s invocation of its powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to rectify the error was deemed justified. Consequently, the appeal for the Assessment Year 2007-08 was dismissed in favor of the assessee, with the substantial questions of law being answered against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>