<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 21 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and cross objection filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. It concluded that the AO cannot add under Section 68 for cash deposits in a bank account, as it is not a book of account. The addition of Rs. 74,91,800/- was deleted, deeming the entire addition made by the AO unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 21 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and cross objection filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. It concluded that the AO cannot add under Section 68 for cash deposits in a bank account, as it is not a book of account. The addition of Rs. 74,91,800/- was deleted, deeming the entire addition made by the AO unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>