<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 13 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the addition of Rs. 33,34,000/- under Section 68 unsustainable as the deposits were in the bank account, not the books of accounts. The Tribunal ruled the addition should have been under Section 69, deleting the addition and allowing the appeal. Other grounds were not addressed as the main issue favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 13 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the addition of Rs. 33,34,000/- under Section 68 unsustainable as the deposits were in the bank account, not the books of accounts. The Tribunal ruled the addition should have been under Section 69, deleting the addition and allowing the appeal. Other grounds were not addressed as the main issue favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>