<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401204</link>
    <description>Tribunal service rules must preserve judicial independence by ensuring judicial dominance in Search-cum-Selection Committees, excluding voting control by the sponsoring department, and providing finality in recommendations subject only to a waiting list. The prescribed four-year tenure was considered too short and had to be revised to five years with adjusted age limits. Advocates with at least 10 years&#039; experience and eligible members of the Indian Legal Service were treated as suitable for judicial membership, subject to functional criteria and suitability assessment. The Rules were held prospective only, and an independent institutional mechanism was required for tribunal administration, supervision, discipline and infrastructure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401204</link>
      <description>Tribunal service rules must preserve judicial independence by ensuring judicial dominance in Search-cum-Selection Committees, excluding voting control by the sponsoring department, and providing finality in recommendations subject only to a waiting list. The prescribed four-year tenure was considered too short and had to be revised to five years with adjusted age limits. Advocates with at least 10 years&#039; experience and eligible members of the Indian Legal Service were treated as suitable for judicial membership, subject to functional criteria and suitability assessment. The Rules were held prospective only, and an independent institutional mechanism was required for tribunal administration, supervision, discipline and infrastructure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>