<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1832 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291942</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the TPO to accept the internal CUP and internal TNMM methods as the most appropriate methods for benchmarking the international transactions. The ITAT also instructed the TPO to reconsider the selection of comparable companies in line with the assessee&#039;s suggestions. Consequently, the issues of consequential interest and penalty proceedings were rendered moot, as they depended on the primary transfer pricing adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1832 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291942</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the TPO to accept the internal CUP and internal TNMM methods as the most appropriate methods for benchmarking the international transactions. The ITAT also instructed the TPO to reconsider the selection of comparable companies in line with the assessee&#039;s suggestions. Consequently, the issues of consequential interest and penalty proceedings were rendered moot, as they depended on the primary transfer pricing adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>