<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1613 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of the upward adjustment of Rs. 37,716,838/-. It emphasized the appropriateness of internal TNMM and CUP methods, the comparability of certain companies, and the inclusion of foreign exchange gains in operating profit calculations. The Tribunal noted that since the revenue did not appeal against the exclusion of certain comparables by the CIT(A), no further adjudication was necessary on those companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:11:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1613 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of the upward adjustment of Rs. 37,716,838/-. It emphasized the appropriateness of internal TNMM and CUP methods, the comparability of certain companies, and the inclusion of foreign exchange gains in operating profit calculations. The Tribunal noted that since the revenue did not appeal against the exclusion of certain comparables by the CIT(A), no further adjudication was necessary on those companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>