<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1363 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291932</link>
    <description>A registered agreement of sale, without transfer of title, possession, or any charge or other proprietary interest, does not create a security interest under insolvency law and cannot confer secured financial creditor status. Mere contractual rights to enforce performance are insufficient, and registration does not alter that character. The Tribunal also declined to interfere with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial decision, finding no material basis to disturb its treatment of the applicants or its approval of the resolution plan. The applicants&#039; claim to equitable relief therefore failed, and their applications were dismissed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:11:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1363 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291932</link>
      <description>A registered agreement of sale, without transfer of title, possession, or any charge or other proprietary interest, does not create a security interest under insolvency law and cannot confer secured financial creditor status. Mere contractual rights to enforce performance are insufficient, and registration does not alter that character. The Tribunal also declined to interfere with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial decision, finding no material basis to disturb its treatment of the applicants or its approval of the resolution plan. The applicants&#039; claim to equitable relief therefore failed, and their applications were dismissed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>