<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1600 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal authorized the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to take possession of the Shed, citing powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. A dissenting opinion argued against dispossession without a court order. The Corporate Debtor was ordered into liquidation as no resolution plan was received, appointing the Resolution Professional as Liquidator to commence the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:11:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1600 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal authorized the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to take possession of the Shed, citing powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. A dissenting opinion argued against dispossession without a court order. The Corporate Debtor was ordered into liquidation as no resolution plan was received, appointing the Resolution Professional as Liquidator to commence the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>