<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1533 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291934</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition to initiate CIRP, citing the presence of disputes concerning the debt and service quality, which precluded the process under the IBC. The Tribunal underscored that IBC is not for debt recovery but for insolvency resolution. The parties were advised to resolve the matter amicably or pursue civil litigation for remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1533 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291934</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition to initiate CIRP, citing the presence of disputes concerning the debt and service quality, which precluded the process under the IBC. The Tribunal underscored that IBC is not for debt recovery but for insolvency resolution. The parties were advised to resolve the matter amicably or pursue civil litigation for remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>