<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1411 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291938</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, admitted an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a company due to outstanding dues of &amp;amp;8377;25,85,612/-. The Tribunal dismissed the Respondent&#039;s defense of price increase and quality issues, finding no substantial pre-existing dispute. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and a deposit of &amp;amp;8377;2 lacs was ordered. The Tribunal imposed a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code on the Respondent, affirming jurisdiction and instructing procedural steps for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1411 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291938</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, admitted an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a company due to outstanding dues of &amp;amp;8377;25,85,612/-. The Tribunal dismissed the Respondent&#039;s defense of price increase and quality issues, finding no substantial pre-existing dispute. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and a deposit of &amp;amp;8377;2 lacs was ordered. The Tribunal imposed a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code on the Respondent, affirming jurisdiction and instructing procedural steps for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>