<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 946 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401191</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding claims for prior period expenses and deduction of excise transport fees for AY 2002-03. The Court highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s role as the final fact-finding authority and emphasized the limited scope for interference in factual determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 946 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401191</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding claims for prior period expenses and deduction of excise transport fees for AY 2002-03. The Court highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s role as the final fact-finding authority and emphasized the limited scope for interference in factual determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>