https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291910 The High Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge in a case involving the interpretation of conditions under the Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. The petitioner's compliance with the conditions of the "Non-automatic Route" was found satisfactory, allowing for 90% of the allocable area to be used for industrial purposes. The Court dismissed the government's appeal, confirming that the withdrawal of permission based on alleged violation of conditions was unjustified. Consequently, the respondent was granted tax benefits under the "Non-automatic Route." en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291910 The High Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge in a case involving the interpretation of conditions under the Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. The petitioner's compliance with the conditions of the "Non-automatic Route" was found satisfactory, allowing for 90% of the allocable area to be used for industrial purposes. The Court dismissed the government's appeal, confirming that the withdrawal of permission based on alleged violation of conditions was unjustified. Consequently, the respondent was granted tax benefits under the "Non-automatic Route." Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291910