<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 895 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401140</link>
    <description>Prolonged custody, non-commencement of trial, and failure of the prosecution to produce panch witnesses for the recovery proceedings supported grant of bail in a second bail application. The Court treated the long incarceration and stalled trial as relevant to continued detention, and noted that the absence of material search witnesses weakened the credibility of the recovery. Bail was granted subject to conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 895 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401140</link>
      <description>Prolonged custody, non-commencement of trial, and failure of the prosecution to produce panch witnesses for the recovery proceedings supported grant of bail in a second bail application. The Court treated the long incarceration and stalled trial as relevant to continued detention, and noted that the absence of material search witnesses weakened the credibility of the recovery. Bail was granted subject to conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>