https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401135 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused in a case involving an alleged offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found that the Trial Court did not err in acquitting the accused as the complainant's admissions and lack of direct evidence of a recoverable debt weakened the case. The High Court emphasized that effective cross-examination by the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:40:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401135 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused in a case involving an alleged offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found that the Trial Court did not err in acquitting the accused as the complainant's admissions and lack of direct evidence of a recoverable debt weakened the case. The High Court emphasized that effective cross-examination by the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401135